Topyaps Logo

Topyaps Logo Topyaps Logo Topyaps Logo Topyaps Logo

Topyaps menu

Responsive image

Supreme Court Draws Curtains On Kargil Scam Because Of Decisions By Lower Courts

Updated on 10 July, 2016 at 6:59 pm By

The victory in the Kargil War may have been one of the high points in India’s post-Independence history but what happened in the aftermath of the war was a blot on the face of the country.


Advertisement

Sixteen years ago irregularities were alleged in procurement of material, munitions and missiles during the war sparking a major political controversy.

The Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led NDA government at the Centre was severely criticized after allegations of corruption in the purchase of coffins surfaced.

The NDA government bought about 500 caskets for USD 2,500 each – thirteen times higher than the actual price at the time, causing a loss of USD 1,87,000 in the purchase.

In 2009, the CBI filed a chargesheet in the investigation launched in 2002. The chargesheet named three Indian Army officials and a US company but did not implicate then defence minister George Fernandes.

A trial court had in December 2013 discharged all accused with one Victor Baiza getting discharged in September this year.



 

When K.G. Dhananjay Chauhan moved the apex court for investigation into the alleged wrongdoings in the purchases done in 1999 claiming that the war scam was worth Rs.24,000 crore, the apex court declined it saying that plea had become infructuous in the wake of previous decisions by lower courts.

An apex court bench of Justice T.S. Thakur and Justice V. Gopala Gowda declined the plea as counsel S. Balasubramanian appearing for the Centre told the court that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had arraigned Baiza in the aluminium casket purchase case, but he was discharged by the court of metropolitan magistrate.


Advertisement

Similarly, Balasubramanian said, the CBI investigated the charges of wrongdoing in the purchase of Krasonpol ammunition, found nothing and filed a closure report that too was accepted by a trial court.

Counsel Balasubramanian said that allegations of wrongdoing in the purchase of snow suits were based on mere apprehensions as no contract was entered into and consequently no money was paid.

The apex court, which has been monitoring the case since 2004, closed the matter and disposed of the PIL after the Centre and the CBI said all the accused were discharged by the trial court and nothing survived in the case.


Advertisement

The CBI, which was asked to probe the case in June 2005, had initially registered 25 cases but the agency could not find sufficient evidence to proceed against anyone after a decade of investigations.

Advertisement

Latest Stories

Glamorous Avatar of Rasika Dugal, Mirzapur Actress Will Have You Drooling All Over Her Instagram Feed

Glamorous Avatar of Rasika Dugal, Mirzapur Actress Will Have You Drooling All Over Her Instagram Feed


30 Year Old Joselyn Cano Aka ‘Mexican Kim Kardashian’ Dies After Cosmetic surgery Gone Wrong

30 Year Old Joselyn Cano Aka ‘Mexican Kim Kardashian’ Dies After Cosmetic surgery Gone Wrong


Government Temporarily Suspends All Flights from UK Fears of New Covid Super-Spreader Strain

Government Temporarily Suspends All Flights from UK Fears of New Covid Super-Spreader Strain


Did You Know That Shahrukh Khan Once Removed Aishwarya Rai From Five Films?

Did You Know That Shahrukh Khan Once Removed Aishwarya Rai From Five Films?


Karan Johar Submits Reply to NCB After Receiving Notice on Party Video & You Don’t Want to Miss These Twitter Reactions

Karan Johar Submits Reply to NCB After Receiving Notice on Party Video & You Don’t Want to Miss These Twitter Reactions


Advertisement

Most Searched

More From News

Popular on The Web